Article 50's transparency obligations have applied since 2 August 2026: if your company runs a chatbot, generates AI content, or lets an agent reply on your behalf, this already touches you. We don't sell "compliance" as an abstract promise. We deliver an inventory, a risk gap review, and a plan your own team can run, in 10 business days.
The Digital Omnibus pushed Annex III high-risk obligations to December 2027. It moved the deadline, not the work. Article 50 transparency was not moved: it is already in force.
Chatbot disclosure, AI-content labeling, deepfake marking. Applies to almost any company with automated customer-facing communication or AI-generated content.
Systems placed on the market before August 2026 must meet the Article 50(2) marking and detection requirement.
Annex III: HR, education, credit, essential services, and similar sensitive decision workflows. Delayed, not cancelled.
High-risk AI embedded in regulated products under Annex I, the furthest date on the calendar.
Every offer has scope, price, and duration fixed in advance. Nothing gets billed as a surprise: scope changes are quoted separately, never absorbed silently.
An AI-use inventory for the agreed scope, provider/deployer role, an Article 50 transparency gap review, draft user notices for chatbots, synthetic-media labeling guidance, a basic evidence register, and a one-page internal policy.
EUR 4,900–7,500
REQUEST → Read the one-pager (PDF) ↓A plain-language EU AI Act briefing, live mapping of your company's visible AI use cases, what must be transparent now versus what could become high-risk later, and a 30-day action plan.
EUR 2,500–5,000
REQUEST → Read the one-pager (PDF) ↓ Learn more about this offer →Use-case and role mapping, Annex III screening with documented rationale, a governance maturity review, and a roadmap through December 2027.
EUR 8,000–15,000
REQUEST → Read the one-pager (PDF) ↓ Learn more about this offer →Turns an assessment into a running system: an AI system registry, use-case owners, a risk and control tracker, an evidence repository, and a management dashboard, inside Maaia.
EUR 7,500–20,000
REQUEST → Read the one-pager (PDF) ↓ Learn more about this offer →A full Safa Studios implementation of one strategically important AI workflow: risk-management design, documentation, human oversight, and an implementation evidence pack. Quoted by SOW, like the rest of Build & Transformation.
EUR 20,000–35,000
REQUEST →This is a practical readiness and implementation engagement. It does not replace advice from your own legal counsel, a formal conformity assessment, or certification. We work alongside your counsel, never in its place, and never promise a guaranteed compliance outcome.
86% of family offices are already piloting or using AI, but only 40% have a formal governance framework (KPMG Global Family Business Survey 2026). If your entity has EU presence or EU investments, an AI-driven investment-scoring tool can trigger Annex III high-risk status, with fines up to EUR 15M or 3% of global turnover. Switzerland is where this is sharpest: 91 single-family offices and 187 multi-family offices, the largest MFO sector relative to size in the world.
A fund needs governance for its own sourcing and due-diligence tools, but its portfolio companies are often AI Act providers, not just deployers, a heavier obligation. We offer a portfolio-wide readiness program: one relationship, many companies covered, positioned the same way funds already offer shared legal or recruiting services.
For the complete breakdown of what moved and what did not under the Digital Omnibus, read the article.
No cost, no commitment. You leave the call with a recommended next step, whether you hire us or not.